Partitioning Somalia Will Not Bring Peace to the Horn of Africa

Somalia is a sovereign state, a member of the United Nations, the African Union, the Arab League, Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the East African Economic Community. Its borders are internationally recognized and protected under international law, including the UN Charter and the AU’s founding principle of respecting post-colonial boundaries. Proposals to partition Somalia contradict these principles and threaten to destabilize not only Somalia but the wider continent.
August 23, 2025
image_print

Somalia is a sovereign state, a member of the United Nations, the African Union, the Arab League, Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the East African Economic Community. Its borders are internationally recognized and protected under international law, including the UN Charter and the AU’s founding principle of respecting post-colonial boundaries. Proposals to partition Somalia contradict these principles and threaten to destabilize not only Somalia but the wider continent.

Somalia is often misrepresented as another case of contested statehood. In reality, it is one of the few countries where citizens share a common language, religion, and culture. Somalis are bound through deep genealogical ties that extend across the very territory some now seek to divide. The civil war that devastated the country was not rooted in ethnic or religious difference, but in competition for power and resources. The grievances that followed, including those voiced in the north, are political and can be resolved within a united Somali framework.

That framework is gradually being rebuilt. Over the past decade, the Federal Government has worked with regions and communities to establish autonomous administrations that reflect local needs while remaining part of the national structure. In 2025, after extensive consultations, residents of Sool and Sanaag chose to form the new federal member state of the North Eastern State, reaffirming their decision to remain within Somalia. Their choice underscores an often-overlooked truth: many northern communities reject partition and seek solutions within a united republic.

That truth was violently tested in 2023, when Somaliland forces launched a military campaign against communities in the northeast that resisted their authority, displacing more than 200,000 civilians. Far from demonstrating consensus, this violence revealed the opposite: Somaliland is not monolithic. Communities from Awdal to Sool, Sanaag, regions have consistently opposed secession, regarding it not as a national aspiration but as the project of a single dominant clan.

For Somalia’s international partners, especially the United States, understanding this reality is essential, not only because it corrects the distorted picture often seen abroad, but also because the stakes extend far beyond Somali politics. Counterterrorism operations depend on close Somali cooperation, including drone strikes, joint missions, and basing arrangements. Endorsing, or imposing, partition in favor of a secessionist movement representing only a small minority would fracture these efforts, complicate intelligence sharing, and weaken the Somali National Army at a moment when unity is most critical in the fight against al-Shabaab and ISIS.

Partition, far from resolving conflict, would reignite and deepen it by hardening political grievances into identity divisions that cannot be bargained away. Beyond Somalia, it would embolden separatist movements across Africa and erode the African Union’s cornerstone principle of preserving post-colonial borders. Some cite governance differences as justification, but good administration alone is not a basis for sovereignty—and the disparities between Somali regions are far less stark than often claimed. The collapse of South Sudan after independence offers a sobering reminder that statehood without consensus produces instability rather than peace.

The Federal Government of Somalia believes grievances must be addressed through dialogue, not division. Our federal system provides a framework for wide autonomy, accountability, and self-governance without sacrificing national unity. This is why Somalia recognized the SSC-Khaatumo administration (now North Eastern State) and welcomed its people’s decision to remain within the Somali Republic. The Prime Minister’s recent visit to Las Anod, accompanied by the release of 25 prisoners, demonstrates our commitment to reconciliation and inclusive peacebuilding.

Meanwhile, Somalia’s international partnerships are delivering results. In 2025 alone, Somali and U.S. forces carried out dozens of successful operations against al-Shabaab. This cooperation reflects a shared understanding: a secure and unified Somalia is vital for regional stability and global counterterrorism. A fractured Somalia, by contrast, would give extremists more space to operate, weaken intelligence coordination, and divert resources from shared priorities.

We also welcome the recent statement by the U.S. President reaffirming support for Somalia’s unity and warning against hostile actors seeking to destabilize the Horn of Africa. His remarks highlight a broader truth: Somalia’s territorial integrity is central to any effective allied strategy in this region.

Somalia is not yet whole, but it is healing. We are building a democratic, federal republic that represents all Somalis. The path forward lies not in fragmentation, but in strengthening the institutions of unity. Borders alone cannot secure peace—only Somalis, working together, can.

 

* Dahir Hassan Abdi is the Ambassador of the Federal Republic of Somalia to the United States.

 

Source: https://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2025/08/20/partitioning_somalia_will_not_bring_peace_to_the_horn_of_africa_1130121.html