Trump’s Gaza Threat Also Targets Türkiye

Trump’s preference for Zionism and Netanyahu means supporting anti-Türkiye policies, redirecting PKK and ISIS terrorism back toward Türkiye, sabotaging the order-building process of the Syrian revolution through YPG terrorist forces, encouraging the coup-plotting, sectarian, and nationalist front (the February 28/Gezi/July 15 coalition) toward renewed political chaos, and bringing various scenarios targeting Erdoğan back onto the agenda.
Trump’s Gaza Plan: A Move to Gain Zionist Lobby Support?
During a press conference following his meeting with Netanyahu at the White House, Trump advocated for the takeover of Gaza by the United States and the implementation of a long-term ownership strategy for the region. He also suggested that it would be more appropriate to relocate Palestinians to neighboring countries such as Egypt and Jordan.
In the U.S. presidential system, cabinet appointments and the process of forming a new administration are likely to bring significant political balances. Could Trump’s recent statements about the Gaza Strip be interpreted as a reflection of these political calculations? It is plausible that these remarks were made to secure the support of the Zionist lobby, which holds considerable influence over U.S. policymaking, and to establish a favorable power balance in key appointments.
While these statements are unquestionably unacceptable in terms of international law and regional dynamics, they could also signal an impending chaos in which the turbulence the U.S. is experiencing under Trump escalates into new global conflicts and disasters.
Trump’s Gaza Plan: An Armageddon Fantasy?
During his first term, the Trump administration pursued policies that maintained U.S.-Israel relations at their tightest historical level. His decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, acknowledge the Golan Heights as Israeli territory, and attempt to reshape regional diplomatic balances through the Abraham Accords demonstrated how proactive he was in this regard.
Considering the significant financial and political power of the Jewish lobby in the U.S., Trump’s desire to appease this group can be seen as a logical move.
While Trump advocates for turning Gaza into an international center after its destruction, the likelihood of this idea materializing appears to be extremely low. Whether the international community would support such a project is another matter entirely. Moreover, placing Gaza under U.S. military and political control could trigger a new war in the region.
The Trump-Netanyahu Alliance May Also Target Türkiye
During his presidency, Trump criticized U.S. policies in the Middle East, condemned the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan as mistakes, and pledged to withdraw from Syria. At times, he even criticized Netanyahu’s brutality, which had turned Israel and the Jewish people into a cursed force in global perception through the Gaza occupation. Within the U.S. system, the unconditional support given to Israel under the influence of Evangelism—Christian Zionism—had created expectations for an anti-Netanyahu stance, especially in response to the public outrage over the genocidal war waged after October 7. The ceasefire process in Gaza, initiated under U.S. pressure, was also interpreted as a development supporting this tendency.
However, Trump’s decision to invite Netanyahu as his first major guest after leaving office and subsequently adopting a rhetoric similar to Netanyahu’s was seen as a signal of a shift in policy. Following his erratic statements on Panama, Canada, Colombia, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Greenland, Trump’s fanatical Zionist stance on Gaza has alarmed the international community.
Trump’s Choice Will Also Determine the Fate of the U.S.
Netanyahu’s actions—stationing forces in the Golan Heights to suppress the Syrian revolution and inciting the Druze against it, as well as openly taking a war stance against both Türkiye and Syria by supporting the PKK-YPG—are pushing Trump’s Middle East policy into a framework where relations with Türkiye are central. Will Trump’s America, a NATO member and U.S. ally, turn against Türkiye by offering unconditional support to Netanyahu and Zionist barbarism, or will he limit his backing of the Zionist lobby to mere rhetoric and choose to strengthen relations with Türkiye as a stabilizing force in the Middle East?
If Trump opts for the first scenario, it would mean supporting anti-Türkiye policies, redirecting PKK and ISIS terrorism toward Türkiye, sabotaging the order-building process of the Syrian revolution through YPG terrorist forces, encouraging the coup-plotting, sectarian, and nationalist front (the February 28/Gezi/July 15 coalition) into renewed political chaos, and bringing various scenarios targeting Erdoğan back onto the agenda.
This choice will also reveal whether Zionism’s so-called Armageddon fantasy—one that not only engulfs Palestine and the Middle East in flames but also aims to use the U.S. as a battering ram to drag the entire world into destruction—is merely a conspiracy theory or a calculated act of Aryan fascist blackmail designed to maintain global dominance, potentially collapsing U.S. hegemony and the so-called American century.