Is This Microphone On? A Review of The Kissinger Tapes

Richard Nixon’s White House was a rampart of pettiness, paranoia, racism, and cruelty. Populated by sycophants and soldiers of the US right-wing, it was also the domain of one of history’s most calculatingly heartless rulers. I’m not talking about Richard Nixon—who certainly would not win any awards for compassion—but about his advisor and eventual Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger. After reading a just-published collection of tape recordings secretly made by Kissinger during his years in the Nixon White House, a few other descriptors come to mind: vain, arrogant, calculating and ultimately murderous. In all fairness, I’ve held this opinion of Kissinger since 1969, when he was first appointed by Nixon; nothing I’ve read or nothing Kissinger did since then has ever changed that opinion. Indeed, it’s only hardened it. This new book, titled The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations, only confirms my merciless opinion of the man.

Edited by Tom Wells, who has authored a few books including a comprehensive history of the movement against the US war in Vietnam titled The War Within: America’s Battle over Vietnam and Wild Man: The Life and Times of Daniel Ellsberg, this text includes close to six hundred pages of transcribed recordings selected from more than twenty thousand pages of Kissinger’s secret recordings. The tapes reveal an Oval Office where lying was ubiquitous and most human lives were irrelevant except in terms of how many dead bodies it might take to get an adversarial government to submit to Washington’s desires. The dispassionate manner in which human death is discussed not only reflects a sociopathy all too often present in rulers of nations; it is also a commentary on not just the banality of evil but also the willingness of those in power to commit evil deeds for the purposes of power itself.

An early example of this mentality in the Nixon administration appeared when the North Korean military shot down a US spy plane, killing all thirty-one people on board. Wells reveals in his commentary that Kissinger considered using tactical nuclear weapons, telling Nixon that “All hell will break loose for two months, but at end of the road there will be peace in Asia.” This cavalier attitude towards nuclear weapons use appears throughout the book, most often expressed by Kissinger. For those who know Kissinger’s history, it’s no surprise he considered the use of nuclear weapons as often as he did. In fact, the use of tactical nukes was the subject of his 1957 book Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. A similar callousness toward human life is revealed in conversation after conversation where the US war in Vietnam was the topic. If anything, these recordings reveal an obsession with victory that was ultimately denied and an increasingly greater willingness to use carpet bombing as the path to that victory. Even after the so-called peace agreement was signed in January 1973 after weeks of some of the heaviest US bombing in the war known as the Christmas bombings, Kissinger and Nixon continued to advocate and order more bombing while on the ground much of the South Vietnamese military did its best to avoid combat. Meanwhile, the illegal US bombing of Cambodia and Laos took place for years without the US public’s knowledge. These transcripts reveal the deception required to keep most of the US government un aware.

Then there was Chile, a government beholden to the United States during Nixon’s first term. That is, until the election of the socialist Salvador Allende to the presidency in 1971; a Left victory despite the efforts of the Chilean right wing, certain US corporations and the Nixon-Kissinger duet. If anything, these recordings make it quite clear that Kissinger was not going to allow Allende’s government to succeed. His interest in getting rid of the socialist in Chile rivaled his determination to bomb Vietnam as much as he could before finally assenting to a peace agreement that could have been achieved in 1969; the final text of the agreement included virtually every one of the Vietnamese National Liberation Front’s 1969 demands.

Richard Nixon’s end was a number of things, but mostly it was both tragic and deserved. His lying and deception should have been enough from keeping him from a second term in the White House; instead, it was ignored by the voting public who put Nixon back in office by a significant majority. However, the doggedness of a couple reporters together with a slighted FBI agent tacitly supported by a segment of the ruling elites took the man down; the final memory of Richard Nixon in the White House being a photo of him waving goodbye in front of the helicopter taking him and his family to California where he lived. The relevant recordings transcribed in this text show the final years of Henry Kissinger serving at Nixon’s side as years of Kissinger distancing himself from the scandal that undid the Nixon regime. Like his years before Watergate, Kissinger lied and otherwise manipulated the press, the records and whatever else he could in order to maintain the image he had of himself. Briefly stated, Kissinger was not only a manipulative bully, he was also egotistical and vain, a trait that comes through in his comments about women and in his approach to the rest of the world. When combined with an imperial view that placed the hegemonic desire of the United States government as the basis for all international policy, that ego put the entire world in danger.

As I write this review a war begun by the United States and Israel threatens the world; a war undertaken at the command of a White House administration with an even greater arrogance than the one that featured Nixon and Kissinger. Just to be clear, my observations comparing the imperial White House of Nixon and Kissinger with that of Trump and company should not be taken as a longing for or preference for the Nixon years, because it certainly is no such thing. Instead, it’s a reminder that the latter could never have existed without the former. As The Kissinger Tapes makes abundantly clear, when it comes to US foreign policy, the more things change the more they stay the same.

*Ron Jacobs is the author of several books, including Daydream Sunset: Sixties Counterculture in the Seventies published by CounterPunch Books. His latest book, titled Reality, Resistance, Rock and Roll is a collection of book reviews written for Counterpunch over the years and is now available. He lives in Vermont. He can be reached at: [email protected]

Source: https://www.counterpunch.org/2026/03/13/is-this-microphone-on-a-review-of-the-kissinger-tapes/